> On 6/13/07, Edd Barrett  wrote:

quoted text
> > Hi guys,

> >

> > I have been reading a thread on opensolaris.org regarding the

> > open-sourcing of 4front's OSS. After explaining why CDDL licensing is

> > unsuitable for OpenBSD, some of the developers have expressed an

> > interest to contact Theo regarding licensing and OpenBSD.

> >

> > I do not know much about licensing, nor do I feel that I should email

> > Theo personally as he may not appreciate it. Just thought I would

> > point out the thread here.

> >

> > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=32401&tstart=0

> > Is OpenBSD even interested in multi threaded OSS? I wouldn't mind it.

>

> "...After much deliberation - we're going with CDDL for BSD. I don't

> know why OpenBSD can't work with CDDL since FreeBSD and NetBSD can."

> - http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=32401&tstart=0

>

> It appears that the question might be whether anyone over in their

> camp is concerned with releasing code under a license even permissive

> enough to be included. They don't seem to care that OpenBSD as a

> project seems to have more stringent goals and policies than others.

Noone cares about being Open and Free anymore.
They just care about being called Open and Free, and how convenient --

a bunch of laywers generated an organization that will label then Open

and Free when they are not in fact so.