Re: carp on a /30?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Newman <dnewman@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 3:40 pm

On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:57 AM, David Newman wrote:

> Each physical interface has two IPv4 addresses, one for a shared IP

You don't actually need an address for each physical interface. It is
nice but really not essential. This is the way I understand it.
Someone can correct me if I am wrong. I can't remember positively but
I think I did this kind of setup about a year ago for a little while.
I am actually going to put this configuration back into production in
the next month or two.

Bryan

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
carp on a /30?, David Newman, (Wed Jun 13, 2:57 pm)
Re: carp on a /30?, Jon Simola, (Wed Jun 13, 4:23 pm)
Re: carp on a /30?, Bryan Vyhmeister, (Wed Jun 13, 3:40 pm)
Re: carp on a /30?, David Newman, (Thu Jun 14, 8:56 pm)