> On 6/13/07, Henning Brauer wrote:
Thanks a lot.
However I wish there were some large companies out there using and
relying in pf, who could just decide (right now) to ship Henning two
machines. Not because it is the right thing to do, but because they
will directly benefit, immediately. They could do so completely out
of self-interest.
But perhaps there are no large companies using pf? That's entirely
possible, I suppose.
Supporting requests like Henning's out of the pocket change that our
private user community has is rather crazy; it is a management
headache for us to wait for money, then move it around. Using such
(smallish) monies to keep other project needs under control -- that is
smart.
These performance enhancements will not affect regular private users,
but will be of particular benefit to companies who use our software in
larger installs. Companies should stand up when such requests are
made, or they and their employees should be ashamed of themselves for
not having any vision, at all.
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 05/37] dccp: Cleanup routines for feature negotiation |
| Lennert Buytenhek | [PATCH 16/39] mv643xx_eth: get rid of ETH_/ethernet_/eth_ prefixes |
