Good catch on this guys.  We should remember that most modern NAT is

PAT, or hybrid NAT+PAT.   You should ask your ISP for more space to NAT

to (A NAT+PAT hybrid pool).
Cisco calls it overloading.  Reminds me of a Soundgarden song.
~BAS
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 12:03 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:

quoted text
> On 2007/06/13 12:01, Geraerts Andy wrote:

> > >> Jun 13 11:05:01 spock /bsd: pf: NAT proxy port allocation (50001-65535)

> > >> failed

> > >> 

IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited.  Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.