Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>, <stu@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 - 9:50 am

Stuart Henderson wrote:

This workaround only works if the checker connects to your MX, not to
the host sending the mail. I know they are somewhat broken but there is
no point in contacting the sender domain server if you want to check for
an openrelay as the from header is more than likely a fake.

Also, MS exchange servers don't like 4xx errors at DATA time and may
forbid the mail from being delivered until the exchange instance is
restarted. I know this is also a bug in Exchange, but many people use it.

>

Yes, but that means callouts that should not succeed will (at least the
first time).

I know no scheme is perfect, so the point is it could be handy to have a
flag to determine when the mail should be greylisted and let people choose.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 4:21 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Bob Beck, (Tue May 22, 12:52 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 1:19 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 1:03 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Tue May 22, 6:57 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 8:08 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Henning Brauer, (Wed May 23, 5:43 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Tue May 22, 8:36 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 8:49 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Stuart Henderson, (Tue May 22, 9:10 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 9:50 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Stuart Henderson, (Tue May 22, 10:53 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 11:12 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Stuart Henderson, (Tue May 22, 11:53 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 12:35 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Jacob Yocom-Piatt, (Tue May 22, 11:39 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Darth Lists, (Tue May 22, 12:58 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 5:20 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Henning Brauer, (Wed May 23, 5:46 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Henning Brauer, (Wed May 23, 6:04 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Henning Brauer, (Thu May 24, 8:35 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Bob Beck, (Thu May 24, 11:08 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Henning Brauer, (Thu May 24, 7:55 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Philip Guenther, (Thu May 24, 8:11 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Chad M Stewart, (Thu May 24, 9:09 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Wed May 23, 6:10 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Henning Brauer, (Wed May 23, 6:13 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Philip Guenther, (Wed May 23, 6:02 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Wed May 23, 5:58 am)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 6:29 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 6:03 pm)
Re: Spamd default behaviour of accepting everything, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 22, 6:54 pm)