login
Header Space

 
 

Re: very weak bridge performance

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 - 2:34 pm

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:09:03AM -0700, Peter Hessler wrote:

bridging is layer 2 and has nothing to do with net.inet.ip.forwarding=1.
The problem is more somewhere deep inside the bridging code. One possible
problem could be a to small interface queue but I could be totaly wrong.
If nobody beats me I will have a look at this somewhen in the next month
or so.


-- 
:wq Claudio
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
very weak bridge performance, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 15, 1:04 pm)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Peter Hessler, (Tue May 15, 2:09 pm)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Claudio Jeker, (Tue May 15, 2:34 pm)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Peter Hessler, (Tue May 15, 3:10 pm)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Mark Pecaut, (Tue May 15, 5:03 pm)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Marco Peereboom, (Tue May 15, 1:12 pm)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Renaud Allard, (Wed May 16, 2:54 am)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 15, 1:32 pm)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Diana Eichert, (Tue May 15, 2:23 pm)
Re: very weak bridge performance, Renaud Allard, (Tue May 15, 3:58 pm)
speck-geostationary