On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 10:22 -0400, ericfurman@fastmail.net wrote:
Speaking as someone who has read more of the gnu.org and fsf.org Web
sites and (probably) listened to Richard Stallman speeches than most of
the OpenBSD user community:
Nothing in the GPL prohibits commercial use of code released under the
GPL. It is perfectly fine to sell copies of GPLed code at any price.
What is *not* perfectly fine is to sell copies of GPLed code without
allowing access to the source code.
The GPL is not about limiting commerical use of software. The GPL is
about preserving freedom (i.e. "share and share alike"). The GNU Ada
compiler is commerical software, which also happens to be released under
the GPL.
(It is worth noting that even Richard Stallman himself understands that
the GPL and LGPL are not always the best choices. One example of this:
)
--
Shawn K. Quinn
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm4 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Lovich, Vitali | RE: [PATCH] Packet socket: mmapped IO: PACKET_TX_RING |
git: | |
