On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:29:52 +0200, "Marc Balmer"
said:
When I read Michael Buesch's original e-mail, I figured this out. He was
probably just using it for testing purposes.
I do not call myself a programmer. I just know enough scripting to get
my job done, but even I figured this out. It doesn't take a genius.
>
A CVS is not by any stretch of the imagination a public repository
of code for anyone to use. So no code was released hence no
license violation. It doesn't take a genius.
>
Forget it. I was annoyed by the "GPL" Nazis and was going to write
a long diatribe, but what's the point. I would either be preaching to
the choir or just ignored as another one of those people who "just
don't get it".
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
