On 4/6/07 1:26 AM, Andris Delfino wrote:
> First, this wouldn't happen cause I prefer the BSD license, but, if
A) If you really prefer BSD you wouldn't care about what people do
with your code, the only reason why your name as an author is in the
code is because without that anybody could claim "that's my code pay
me", your name is there just to prevent other people put claims on it,
not for your "honour". BSD is about maximum open-ness and making it
impossible to violate copyright.
B) If you don't have the decency to inquire before you do harm to
people, even to a type like Saddam Houssein you are plain stupid asshole.
The whole situation makes me think of the sneaky guy in this one:
http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/12523/f0abd313/index.html
+++chefren
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Nigel Cunningham | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Paul Mundt | Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
