On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino wrote:
No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their
licence.
That said, there are more ways than one to protect one's licence. It
hardly seems unreasonable to privately contact the developer in
question before going public, as seems to be the custom in many other
suspected licence issues.
Choosing to first send a private message would likely have remedied
any issues, both quickly and with a lot less fallout. Too bad that
that didn't happen.
Rogier
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Greg KH | [patch 00/73] 2.6.23-stable review |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
