On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino wrote:
No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their
licence.
That said, there are more ways than one to protect one's licence. It
hardly seems unreasonable to privately contact the developer in
question before going public, as seems to be the custom in many other
suspected licence issues.
Choosing to first send a private message would likely have remedied
any issues, both quickly and with a lot less fallout. Too bad that
that didn't happen.
Rogier
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| jjohansen | [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| holzheu | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 36/37] dccp: Initialisation and type-checking of feature sysctls |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
