On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:55:10PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
I don't believe Michael's initial intention was to have this happen, but
the nature of his first email made it almost guaranteed. For Marcus to
delete the driver is absolutely understandable, and I imagine I would
have done the same.
It's very sad to see people supposedly on the same side fighting instead
of helping each other. It's worth remembering that initial words on a
topic have a lot to do with how it turns out in the end.
--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
| James Bruce | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Peter Zijlstra | [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Rick Jones | Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
