Seg, 2007-04-09 C s 18:29 +0100, Jeroen Massar escreveu:
This shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the way both the GPL
and generic copyright work.
* Nobody is forced to publish derivative works (as long as they
keep them inside doors, eg. internal usage in a company)
* Dual licensing in the way you suggest would be a copyright
violation.
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
