Any license at all is a release from the total copyright held by anyOn Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:20:33PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> It is because you do not understand the definition of free. Let me
> * given without consideration of a return or reward
The GPL 'gives' to the comunity in consideration of getting back
enhancements to the origional. The BSD just gives.
> * not subject to special regulations, restrictions, duties, etc.
Any licence short of releasing to public domain imposes _some_
restrictions. There are just fewer in BSD compared with GPLv2 and fewer
in GPLv2 than in the proposed GPLv3.
Doug.
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
