Any license at all is a release from the total copyright held by anyOn Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:20:33PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> It is because you do not understand the definition of free. Let me
> * given without consideration of a return or reward
The GPL 'gives' to the comunity in consideration of getting back
enhancements to the origional. The BSD just gives.
> * not subject to special regulations, restrictions, duties, etc.
Any licence short of releasing to public domain imposes _some_
restrictions. There are just fewer in BSD compared with GPLv2 and fewer
in GPLv2 than in the proposed GPLv3.
Doug.
| Greg KH | [RFC] sample kobject implementation |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Paul E. McKenney | [PATCH RFC 2/9] RCU: Fix barriers |
| Joe Perches | [PATCH 011/148] include/asm-x86/bug.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting only |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM |
