Artur Grabowski writes:
> "Gregg Reynolds" writes:
To expand on this. I've noticed that the more someone depends on
syntax highlighting, automagic jumping to functions, auto-completion
in editors, etc. the less he actually reads and works with the
code. Tools remove you one step from the code and make you less
intimate with it.
Tools that help you read software is like eating Viagra and installing
an auto-humping device in your bed. Sure it makes things easier, but
you'll be missing quite a lot of important stuff that way.
I do use code viagra occasionally (my favourite brand is id-utils),
when doing large sweeps of the code to change the same thing over and
over, but never when doing something creative.
//art
| Faik Uygur | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| pageexec | Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Mark Lord | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
