login
Header Space

 
 

Re: code analysis tools

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Gregg Reynolds <dev@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 - 5:57 am

Artur Grabowski <art@blahonga.org> writes:


To expand on this. I've noticed that the more someone depends on
syntax highlighting, automagic jumping to functions, auto-completion
in editors, etc. the less he actually reads and works with the
code. Tools remove you one step from the code and make you less
intimate with it.

Tools that help you read software is like eating Viagra and installing
an auto-humping device in your bed. Sure it makes things easier, but
you'll be missing quite a lot of important stuff that way.

I do use code viagra occasionally (my favourite brand is id-utils),
when doing large sweeps of the code to change the same thing over and
over, but never when doing something creative.

//art
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
code analysis tools, Gregg Reynolds, (Mon Mar 26, 2:27 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, Nick !, (Mon Mar 26, 5:54 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, Gregg Reynolds, (Mon Mar 26, 9:21 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, Tobias Ulmer, (Mon Mar 26, 3:44 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, Gregg Reynolds, (Mon Mar 26, 9:27 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, Gregg Reynolds, (Mon Mar 26, 3:16 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, Artur Grabowski, (Tue Mar 27, 4:02 am)
Re: code analysis tools, Artur Grabowski, (Tue Mar 27, 5:57 am)
Re: code analysis tools, Marco Peereboom, (Mon Mar 26, 8:24 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, Gregg Reynolds, (Mon Mar 26, 11:00 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, J.C. Roberts, (Mon Mar 26, 8:55 pm)
Re: code analysis tools, Marco Peereboom, (Mon Mar 26, 9:51 pm)
speck-geostationary