In epistula a Manuel Ravasio die horaque Mon,
19 Mar 2007 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT):> Really?
interestingly, i just had an experience at a customer's site i want to
share in this respect:
they use *cough* GNU/Linux *cough*, RHEL. and XFS. XFS is pretty cool.
however, they lost data. but it was not only about 'losing' data, it
was about a hidden data loss. some data was lost, some not. some had
weird ctime, some not. this is surely thanks to the most perfect
implementation of an *opened* FS (here: XFS) by the GNU/Linux guys.
pretty well done. what happened? a server had a backplane crash, an
externally mounted XFS volume was shut down 'unclean'. although it was
not that big (<1TByte), the desaster happened.
in more than ten years of using IRIX (and thusly, XFS) i never lost one
single sucking file.
:)
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: Multicast packet loss |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
