Re: NOOP and Spamd

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Bob Beck
Date: Monday, March 19, 2007 - 8:40 am

* Sid Carter <sidcarter@symonds.net> [2007-03-19 03:25]:


	Bullshit. that's not a good enough reason  - spamd does not
implement all of smtp, and never will. saying "it's in the smtp
standard" is the wrong way to get anything into spamd :) 

	OTOH, if there is real stuff from the century of the fruit bat
that uses this I'll put it in.  If it's someone's BBS mailer from
the century of Def Leppard and Mullets I'm not bloating the code one line
to deal with it. I've asked the poster for details. Anyone else who
can confirm real stuff needing NOOP please let me know.

	-Bob
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
NOOP and Spamd, Sid Carter, (Sun Mar 18, 9:45 pm)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Darren Spruell, (Sun Mar 18, 10:22 pm)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Lars Hansson, (Sun Mar 18, 11:04 pm)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Shawn K. Quinn, (Sun Mar 18, 11:55 pm)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Sid Carter, (Mon Mar 19, 1:48 am)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Sid Carter, (Mon Mar 19, 2:01 am)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Bob Beck, (Mon Mar 19, 8:40 am)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Dave Anderson, (Mon Mar 19, 12:03 pm)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Timothy A. Napthali, (Mon Mar 19, 7:17 pm)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Lyndon Nerenberg, (Mon Mar 19, 8:39 pm)
Re: NOOP and Spamd, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Mar 20, 3:42 am)