login
Header Space

 
 

Re: No Blob without Puffy

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <info@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Sunday, March 18, 2007 - 10:54 pm

> That was the conversation in detail, nothing altered, nothing left

As it was said, it's "appalling" and "disrespectful". The tread really 
show how focus you and FreBSD is not focus on the issue really. Or have 
no clue how to fight it. You even admit FreeBSD's guilt.


I guess may be I am a little angry to see the shortsighted views of some 
BSD's and how they undermine the efforts of others for their own 
benefit. I guess it is somewhat expected. I thought the BSD's had more 
integrity then others. I guess not. Market share is what they are after 
isn't it?

If you really want to be "focus and productive", first, start by 
removing the BLOB's from FreeBSD, get the other BSD's to do the same, 
then talk with one unify voice.

Then and only then will you get the ears of the vendors and really start 
fighting back the BLOB's issue for real! Then and only then will you get 
my respect, my support and even my financial support if need be.

You talk about freedom of choice, you are not helping it!

I just wish I could find a logo from vendor on hardware saying that the 
hardware is fully supported in open source without BLOB, by real open 
documentations, without NDA.

Then, and only then "my freedom of choice" would be fully respected and 
I could pick good hardware and pay with MY hard earn money, for hardware 
that is fully respectful of me the buyer!

But, I can't get full specs many times before buying it and then get 
stuck with it and go sale it back on E*Bay as bad hardware from low life 
narrow minded vendor that do not understand that providing 
documentations on how to talk to their hardware makes it good for them, 
their bottom line and the users and DO NOT undermine any of their 
intellectual property in anyway.

No code is asked of them in anyway, no secret is asked of them in 
anyway, just the documentations on how to talk to their interfaces so 
that good drivers can be written for the hardware I pay for and that 
will make their reputations better in the end with good reliable and 
performant hardware support for my choice of OS, me the customer that 
pay for the hardware to start with.

The issue is clear and simple really. Documentations on how to use the 
interface of hardware, no secrets, no special treatments, no source 
code, no NDA, and no BLOB's, that's it!

Anything else in your campaign is just a big fat lie and a twisted 
shortsighted narrow minded ways to deal with the issue.

Lead by example and show the way, first by doing what you preach!

At a minimum that's what Theo and OpenBSD at large is doing.

They are leading the way and showing you how to do it too. Just listen.

Theo and OpenBSD at large including all the developers in it, gets a 
hell of a lots of respect from me for doing so. And I support the 
project as much as I possibly can, including developers as well when I 
can. And as long as they keep their integrity as it is, that's not going 
to change either. I did it, I am doing it and I will continue to do it.

They get my vote and $ as well!

I sure hope you see the light soon. But if you really want to start a 
campaign like this, I salute you, however, do it right. Or don't do it 
at all.

Start by doing what you try to preach and remove your own BLOB's first.

Then I will listen, and may be many more as well.

With all due respect and I am sure you mean well, but you go at it the 
wrong way.

Best,

Daniel Ouellet

PS: A small business owner that strongly rely everyday on OpenBSD 
security, ingenuity's, innovations, integrity, stability, track record, 
and openness to earn a living for himself, his family and his employees!

I sure couldn't say that of FreeBSD or trust any other BSD's for that 
matter on a day to day business. I wouldn't know what would sneak in my 
business without my knowledge via BLOB, or other ways.

Or when a vendor decide for me, when I need to trash my hardware because 
it is not supported anymore (because no one can or will fix BLOB's). I 
am not even going to say anything about other open source projects as 
the story is to sad there too. Nor will I care to talk about commercial 
OS that can't be stable or secure and let me sleep comfortable at night, 
or when I actually can.

That's what OpenBSD allow me to do, can you say the same?

Oh, don't even answer that question, your actions and choices of BLOB's 
integrations speaks very loudly just by itslef!
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: No Blob without Puffy, SW, (Sun Mar 18, 7:06 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Karel Kulhavy, (Mon Mar 19, 10:04 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Dave Anderson, (Mon Mar 19, 2:49 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Lars D. Noodén, (Mon Mar 19, 2:59 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Tony Abernethy, (Mon Mar 19, 9:52 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Karel Kulhavy, (Sun Mar 25, 2:47 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Chris Black, (Mon Mar 19, 11:54 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Marco Peereboom, (Mon Mar 19, 11:48 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, chefren, (Mon Mar 19, 7:33 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Dan Farrell, (Tue Mar 20, 10:03 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Karel Kulhavy, (Sun Mar 25, 3:06 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Nick !, (Sun Mar 25, 8:09 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Daniel Ouellet, (Tue Mar 20, 12:43 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Karel Kulhavy, (Sun Mar 25, 3:00 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Nick !, (Tue Mar 20, 10:29 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Daniel Ouellet, (Tue Mar 20, 3:31 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Nick !, (Mon Mar 19, 11:46 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Jason LaRiviere, (Sun Mar 18, 11:30 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Daniel Ouellet, (Sun Mar 18, 10:54 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Rafael Almeida, (Sun Mar 18, 9:41 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Craig Brozefsky, (Sun Mar 18, 9:20 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Luke Bakken, (Sun Mar 18, 8:53 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Jason Dixon, (Sun Mar 18, 8:52 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, SW, (Sun Mar 18, 9:31 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Henning Brauer, (Mon Mar 19, 6:35 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Karel Kulhavy, (Mon Mar 19, 10:27 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Ted Unangst, (Mon Mar 19, 1:31 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Timo Schoeler, (Mon Mar 19, 12:17 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Dan Farrell, (Mon Mar 19, 4:55 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Artur Grabowski, (Mon Mar 19, 12:05 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Dan Farrell, (Mon Mar 19, 11:59 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, RW, (Mon Mar 19, 6:00 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Timo Schoeler, (Mon Mar 19, 7:15 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Artur Grabowski, (Mon Mar 19, 5:00 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Jacob Yocom-Piatt, (Mon Mar 19, 7:56 am)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Rafael Almeida, (Sun Mar 18, 11:31 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Adam, (Sun Mar 18, 10:56 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Jason Dixon, (Sun Mar 18, 10:19 pm)
Re: No Blob without Puffy, Damien Miller, (Sun Mar 18, 11:27 pm)
speck-geostationary