On 3/16/07, Lars Hansson <lars@unet.net.ph> wrote:Yeah. Expectations aside, being condescending is never warranted. Both Karl and Martin did just that. They could have asked if there was a reason it wasn't sent to security-announce@ instead of misc@, rather than saying "This is terrible handling of a bug" after it was fixed almost immediately. Seems some people spend very little time thanking the developers for the immediate fix and instead go straight to suggestions on how to handle their project better. -- Kian Mohageri
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [16/22] x86: Move swsusp __pa() dependent code to arch portion |
| Nick Piggin | [patch 5/6] mm: merge nopfn into fault |
| Chuck Ebbert | Wanted: simple, safe x86 stack overflow detection |
| Balbir Singh | Re: 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 - 'touch' command causes Oops. |
git: | |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH resend] make "git push" update origin and mirrors, "git push --mirror" ... |
| David Kastrup | Re: [OT] Re: C++ *for Git* |
| Bryan Donlan | [PATCH 0/8] Fix git's test suite to pass when the path contains spaces |
| Davide Libenzi | Re: First cut at git port to Cygwin |
| Khalid Schofield | Configuring sendmail openbsd 4.2 |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Jake Conk | Setting up ccd RAID 1 Howto OpenBSD 4.1 |
| Thilo Pfennig | OpenBSD project goals |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Howard Wei-Hao Pan | [Q] Does Linux work with PCMCIA devices? |
| Curtis Yarvin | Re: Problem with UNCOMPRESS |
| Linus Benedict Torvalds | Re: trouble booting 0.11 (continued) |
