login
Header Space

 
 

Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Darren Spruell <phatbuckett@...>
Cc: Jacob Yocom-Piatt <jy-p@...>, <misc@...>
Date: Friday, February 23, 2007 - 9:56 am

On Ter, 2007-02-20 at 17:56 -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:

I think they're gradually moving to do so, I periodically have to check
out the auto-white lists, since sometimes a damn spammer get's through.

Rui

--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, J Moore, (Tue Feb 20, 12:48 am)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Rogier Krieger, (Tue Feb 20, 10:39 am)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Lars Hansson, (Tue Feb 20, 10:57 am)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Jimmy Mäkelä | Loopia AB..., (Tue Feb 20, 10:52 am)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Rogier Krieger, (Tue Feb 20, 11:21 am)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Tue Feb 20, 9:16 am)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, J Moore, (Sat Mar 10, 2:30 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Sat Mar 10, 6:29 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Darrin Chandler, (Sat Mar 10, 7:56 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Sat Mar 10, 10:43 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, J Moore, (Sun Mar 11, 2:27 am)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Darren Spruell, (Sat Mar 10, 2:56 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Philip Guenther, (Sat Mar 10, 3:43 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Darren Spruell, (Sat Mar 10, 3:53 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Philip Guenther, (Sat Mar 10, 4:19 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Woodchuck, (Tue Feb 20, 2:00 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Brian Keefer, (Tue Feb 20, 3:50 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Darren Spruell, (Tue Feb 20, 4:36 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Brian Keefer, (Tue Feb 20, 4:57 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, , (Tue Feb 20, 5:51 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Brian Keefer, (Tue Feb 20, 6:59 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Bob Beck, (Tue Feb 20, 4:23 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? , Theo de Raadt, (Tue Feb 20, 3:54 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Jacob Yocom-Piatt, (Tue Feb 20, 5:07 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Joachim Schipper, (Wed Feb 21, 2:29 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Tue Feb 20, 6:33 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Darren Spruell, (Tue Feb 20, 8:56 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Fri Feb 23, 9:56 am)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Bob Beck, (Tue Feb 20, 5:43 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Han Boetes, (Tue Feb 20, 5:28 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? , Woodchuck, (Tue Feb 20, 4:40 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? , Brian Keefer, (Tue Feb 20, 4:23 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? , Theo de Raadt, (Tue Feb 20, 4:23 pm)
Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive?, Allie D., (Tue Feb 20, 6:21 pm)
speck-geostationary