"Stephan A. Rickauer"  writes:
> I did read your FAQ but I can't see how it rebuts what has just been

quoted text
> said. You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the result is a

> readable and understandable GPL'ed driver, companies will be even less

> motivated to release programming documentation. This will lead to a

> GPL-lock-in since you simply replace the vendor not willing to share

> specifications with an NDA'ed GPL developer not willing to share those,

> but GPL code only.

Which is exactly what the GPL people want since that's the whole point

of the license. Otherwise they wouldn't be using the GPL. Duh.
//art