On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
You seem to have missed:
Q: What about the BSDs?
A: What about them? They are free to do whatever they wish, I
have no input into their development at all, sorry.
> You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the result is a
Well, as my goal is to have a GPL driver for everything, I don't see how
this can hurt :)
Now others can have different goals, and that's great and fine. I'm not
saying you can't work on something if you wish to do so.
But for you to try to tell me that I shouldn't work to achive my goal,
as it somehow conflicts with your goals, is pretty rude, don't you
think?
There is no reason you can not extend the same kind of offer to
companies to help your project achieve success.
> This is not about freedom but about prostitution.
I'm sorry you feel this way.
*plonk*
| Kok, Auke | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 - ioat/dma engine |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Matthew Garrett | [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
