On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
You seem to have missed:
Q: What about the BSDs?
A: What about them? They are free to do whatever they wish, I
have no input into their development at all, sorry.
> You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the result is a
Well, as my goal is to have a GPL driver for everything, I don't see how
this can hurt :)
Now others can have different goals, and that's great and fine. I'm not
saying you can't work on something if you wish to do so.
But for you to try to tell me that I shouldn't work to achive my goal,
as it somehow conflicts with your goals, is pretty rude, don't you
think?
There is no reason you can not extend the same kind of offer to
companies to help your project achieve success.
> This is not about freedom but about prostitution.
I'm sorry you feel this way.
*plonk*
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Ingo Molnar | [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
