Re: [OT] Signing messages: S/MIME vs OpenPGP ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Saturday, December 8, 2007 - 12:30 am

On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:07:07PM -0800, new_guy wrote:

I'd always thought it was the other way around: most individuals seem to
use PGP, whereas companies tend to use S/MIME (presumably because PGP
costs nothing so is worthless as far as many businesses are concerned?).

Also I assume you mean MUA, not MTA, since I don't know of any MTAs that
directly support either PGP or S/MIME...

Ben

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [OT] Signing messages: S/MIME vs OpenPGP ?, new_guy, (Sat Dec 8, 12:07 am)
Re: [OT] Signing messages: S/MIME vs OpenPGP ?, Benjamin M. A'Lee, (Sat Dec 8, 12:30 am)
Re: [OT] Signing messages: S/MIME vs OpenPGP ?, new_guy, (Sat Dec 8, 10:39 am)
Re: [OT] Signing messages: S/MIME vs OpenPGP ?, Rod Whitworth, (Fri Dec 7, 8:53 pm)