Ste Jones wrote:
Between appears to be and being, there is a difference.
Right from the home page,
fifth line "And best of all it's Open Source licensed under the revised
BSD license." have been there for a very long time and the link still is
dead to the license itself.
I keep looking for it and still not good.
Between appears and being, there is a long way.
Just FYI.
Best,
Daniel
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
