Re: Code signing in OpenBSD

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: bofh <goodb0fh@...>
Cc: <misc@...>, Hannah Schroeter <hannah@...>
Date: Thursday, December 6, 2007 - 11:12 am

bofh wrote:

Yeah. It recently disappeared from the ACM's web site after 11+ years
of availability:
http://www.acm.org/classics/oct95/
There is, fortunately, the author's copy:
http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/ken/trust.html

There is an interesting follow up:
http://www.dwheeler.com/trusting-trust/
summary of the followup:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/01/countering_trus.html

The bottom line, however, is that having and using the source is not
optional.

Thus, patches are provided in OpenBSD as source...

But, starting from an initial set of some binaries is adequate for many
uses, just as long as we can make reasonably sure that those binaries
come from who they are supposed to / we expect them to.

The install process ought to be fairly clear about the origin,
authenticity and integrity of those initial binaries. No need to build
on more of a sand foundation than necessary.

-Lars

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Code signing in OpenBSD, Lars Noodén, (Thu Dec 6, 10:01 am)
Re: Code signing in OpenBSD, bofh, (Thu Dec 6, 10:47 am)
Re: Code signing in OpenBSD, Lars Noodén, (Thu Dec 6, 11:12 am)
Re: Code signing in OpenBSD, bofh, (Thu Dec 6, 11:21 am)