Hi!
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:46:15PM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote:
>You know, you're descending into a recursive loop of "if, if, if..." and
If I released code with cryptographic signatures, I'd not leave a secret
key file, nor a passphrase on the servers with the master web/ftp
site. I'd sign on a box you can't access from the master site (nor
the mirrors). So, no, the attacker would *not* gain access to signing
tools (ok, yes, the tools, perhaps, like gpg or openssl, but not the
key material).
>--STeve Andre'
Kind regards,
Hannah.
| Stephane Jourdois | Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 [PATCH] init/missing_syscalls.h fix |
| David Brown | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc2 |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
git: | |
