Re: inetd needed for basic NAT/Firewall operation?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Chris Smith <bsd782@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 - 2:58 pm

On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:49:07AM -0500, Chris Smith wrote:

Hi Chris.

The only service that should (or could,depends on your point of view)
be allowed from the internet is IMHO the identd service.

Blocking this service may cause some delay because some mailers and
irc servers are checking for this service.

OTOH it may be considered as a security risc to give strangers valid
usernames. (If you need inetd requests from the outside and dont want
to give them valid usernames you can install a other identd, e.g.
oidentd or just a fakeidentd to return an arbitrary username)

> I believe it's no longer necessary for ftp-proxy and want to make sure

I don't run ftp-proxy so I don't know about this, sorry.

HTH,

Andreas

--
Windows 95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of
an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit
company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
inetd needed for basic NAT/Firewall operation?, Chris Smith, (Wed Dec 5, 12:49 pm)
Re: inetd needed for basic NAT/Firewall operation?, Andreas Maus, (Wed Dec 5, 2:58 pm)
Re: inetd needed for basic NAT/Firewall operation?, Rod Whitworth, (Wed Dec 5, 5:20 pm)