> while that is entirely true, I really don't see much of a point here.
Personally, I think if I were starting from square one, I'd
do port numbers, not service names, but that's not the way it's
been for many years and even though my preference would be numbers
my loathing for yet another option far outweighs this preference.
So, I'd prefer not to see a knob for this. The change
does not warrant the churn.
-Bob
| Thomas Gleixner | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| James Bottomley | [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2] |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
