> The concept of relicensing does not imply changing or adding code, and
Public domain aside, in what other case would it be legal to change a
license, where no changes were made to the code, and the original
author has not granted permission?
certainly someone could not take BSD licensed code and change it to
GPL if they have changed nothing and do not have the authors
permission.
keep in mind I have limited knowledge at best of software licensing
Sam Fourman Jr.
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Martin Michlmayr | Network slowdown due to CFS |
git: | |
| Paweł Staszewski | rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
