> running non-GPL-covered software? Not I. I frequently run OpenSSH,
> whose license is not the GNU GPL, and is incompatible with the GPL (if
> my memory serves).Richard,
please stop spreading lies (or looking like a fool) by not doing research.The license of OpenSSH is here:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/LICENCE?rev=HEAD
According to
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html
this is GPL-compatible (modified BSD license or better).Thanks for correcting me about that point. I was not sure about it,
which is why I said "(if my memory serves)" in the text you quoted.What puzzles me is why you think this mistake was a lie, or that it
might make me "look like a fool". People normally don't call someone
a liar, or a fool, because of a little (and tangential) mistake like
this.
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 009/196] Chinese: add translation of sparse.txt |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Stephen Rothwell | Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Wenji Wu | A Linux TCP SACK Question |
