Richard Stallman a icrit :

quoted text
> I have no obligation to answer each and every message that people

> post, or address every issue anyone else raises.  Some issues don't

> seem to need answers.

>

There is a difference between "I have no obligation to answer each and

every message" and "I cannot find a coherent answer to several messages".

Why are you encouraging people to use Windows by making gcc and emacs

available for that system ?

I know of at least four companies I've worked with/for that *rely* on

gcc and that would switch to Linux/BSD if gcc was not available on Windows.

You are making it easier for them to keep using a proprietary system,

why are you doing this ? Why are you promoting proprietary software ?
You don't WANT to answer these questions because you know you have no

answer but "We wanted a broader public".
You look like a lawyer twisting laws to serve his own purpose, the irony

being that in that case you made the "laws" that you are now trying to

work-around as they do not serve your purpose well. Please, prove me

wrong, answer the questions that have been asked over a dozen times on

this list already.
Gilles
--

SCHNEIER FACT #69:

  If Bruce Schneier rot-13s a plaintext, it cannot be broken by

applying rot-13 again.