On 13-Dec-07, at 10:22 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Absolutely. You guys deserve to get paid for what you do (insofar as
there are enough people willing to pay you for what you do), nor are
you obligated to tailor the operating system for any particular class
of user. I don't think either of those mean that non-technical
people deserve bad software, it just means they have to find someone
who is both a good programmer and has a desire to make simpler
interfaces for money. That programmer will probably build on top of
your work. Hopefully that'll all fall into place some time in the
not-too-distant future.
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Woodhouse | [PATCH 1/3] firmware: allow firmware files to be built into kernel image |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21 |
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Rick Jones | Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
