-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1Hi,
This is what I felt; All comments are welcome.
If both parties were at fault for somehow giving the user the wrong
idea that flash player is great on BSD OR windows is great coz it runs
emacs, is this the right way to settle it?The honest way is to removing these Makefiles/binaries wherever (if
you really want to encourage free software).
The wicked way is to keep these at the expense of popularity but not
complain about it.
The worst way is to fight about it.Now if one of you didn't do what the other said, that one would be the
bad guy. But if both of you decided to keep these things as they are,
both would be against free software.Which one would you rather be?
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.orgiD8DBQFHYb5TRzTnZfDdIE8RAiE2AJwOkj2Jl9Ls/t9cIdTgoxJ0W4M8OwCfcCGP
9IKozlMUHm4u5N4LI2UYdTs=
=pSrc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
