On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:51:37AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
quoted text
>     his absolutism also causes people to see BSD as a "problem", a
>     "social failure".
> 
> If some people think that, they did not get it from me.  I do not call
> BSD either of those things.  I say that releasing free software under
> a non-copyleft free software license is basically good (i.e., not
> evil), but that using copyleft is better. 
> 
>     recently we saw theft of BSD to GPL, and a large part of the
>     GPL community thinks there's no problem with that, that the
>     BSD community is being "petty" to make an issue out of it.
> 
> I don't think it is wrong in general to relicense code from BSD to
> GPL.  However, in some cases I think it is more useful not to do so,
> in order to contribute changes back to the original BSD-licensed
> project.

It is not just wrong it is fucking illegal.

So much for ethics.

quoted text
> 
> If such an issue arises for a GNU package, and people think it is not
> doing the most useful thing, I will look at the issue and then if
> necessary discuss it with the developers.

Go talk to some of those wireless developers in Linux.  You'll find
plenty examples of unethical behavior and blatant breaking the law.

quoted text
> 
> However, if such an issue arises for a program which is not a GNU
> package, I will not get involved unless the developers ask me for
> advice.
> 
Your advice is as useful as your recommendations.  Last time the
wireless issue was brought up you simply declined to comment.  Ethics in
action again!

I don't know what your agenda is but it stinks.  Tell us, who pays you
again?