If a library has a book on [insert-controversial-topic-here], does that
imply endorsement of said topic by the library or by someone who reads the
book? Should the library burn copies of books on such topics to protect
the citizenry? Absolutely not.
A system distribution is more like an anthology than like a library.
We do consider the editor of the anthology book responsible for the choice
of what to include.
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Arjan van de Ven | [patch 1/3] LatencyTOP infrastructure patch |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 023/196] MCP_UCB1200: Convert from class_device to device |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Wink Saville | Resolving conflicts |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH] Teach git-gui to split hunks |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: kde.git is now online |
| Steffen Prohaska | [PATCH] cygwin: added fopen "b" and open O_BINARY to support cygwin's textmode |
| Almir Karic | Re: find -exec {} help |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Khalid Schofield | Configuring sendmail openbsd 4.2 |
| Timo Myyrä | Encrypting home partition |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] Add a statistics counter for tx hash miss |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1328! |
| David Miller | Re: netif_schedule and mpc5200_fec |
