Users have responsability for what they do. We do not take responsability

    for them. We give them enough information to make their informed decision.
    In my opinion, that's the ethical way to do things.
In my opinion, we ought to take responsibility for the recommendations

and assistance we give to others.  Thus, we should not steer people

towards non-free software.  Even though they are not forced to follow

our advice, we are still responsible for having given it.
    In BSD land, we trust the human nature. We're not condescending to our

    users, we treat them as adults and we let them make *their* own ethical

    choice and take their own decision.
You cannot claim the credit for "letting" them, because it is a fact

that they can do so in any case.  It is misleading to speak of "letting"

or "stopping" the users from installing non-free software.
What's really going on is that you are helping them use the non-free

software, which grants it legitimacy.  That is what I object to.