As far as I understand, the OpenBSD position appears to be that trying
to police users by forbidding them to maintain and retrieve port
metadata about unfree software via this adjunct service (that is not
included in the OS) would be a restriction of the users' freedom.Obviously I disagree with that position. This isn't an issue of the
users' freedom at all. It is an issue of what OpenBSD says to the
public.
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Lennert Buytenhek | [PATCH 16/39] mv643xx_eth: get rid of ETH_/ethernet_/eth_ prefixes |
