First of all I hope I didn't offend the port maintainer of the KDE. MyAntoine Jacoutot wrote:
In my experience OpenBSD is by far the cleanest and the simplest OS I
have ever used in my life. On the another hand KDE is 200m very
elaborate GUI coded for mostly with Linux in mind. I am not aware that
one can use any of KDE graphical tools to configure any of the
OpenBSD services.(I might be very wrong about this). OpenBSD does not
have HAL. So it seems to me that running KDE is just a overkill.
You do not need KDE to set a wall paper or to start applications.
Moreover, why would you let anybody pick default applications for you
and start default desktop services?
That is way personally prefer to run a small WM of the system like OpenBSD.
On another hand who am I to tell you what you want to run on your
desktop. If you want to run KDE you should run it and it is not my
business to ask you why you are doing that.
No Hard Feeling Body,
Predrag
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Eric W. Biederman | [PATCH 0/10] sysfs network namespace support |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
