On Dec 13, 2007 4:58 AM, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote:
quoted text
> > Is there anyone here who actually proposes to prevent users from
> > running non-free software?  Not I.  I think that software is
> > unethical, and I refuse to install it, or suggest it to anyone.  But I
> > have not proposed that systems actually block its installation.
>
> Yet you were in an interview where you argued against using OpenBSD,
> because it permits users to run non-free software.
>
> Your argument was that OpenBSD contains non-free parts in it's
> ports tree.
>
> This has been proven to be false.
>
> Here, go have a look
>
>       ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/poerts.tar.gz

The correct URL is:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/ports.tar.gz (~13.5M)

-Amarendra

quoted text
> It's just an entirely free scaffold of Makefiles and little patches.
> Nothing more.  It is 100% source, and it is 100% free.
>
> If you are going to go around making pronouncements from your pulpit,
> you might want to go educate yourself.
>
> But once again, you failed to educate yourself before you opened your
> big fat mouth on a talk show and stated utterly uneducated and false
> statements .  You have had ample opportunity to say "I was wrong", yet
> you have not done so yet.
>
> You keep argueing, and that is because you are a coward.