> Is there anyone here who actually proposes to prevent users from
Yet you were in an interview where you argued against using OpenBSD,
because it permits users to run non-free software.
Your argument was that OpenBSD contains non-free parts in it's
ports tree.
This has been proven to be false.
Here, go have a look
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/poerts.tar.gz
It's just an entirely free scaffold of Makefiles and little patches.
Nothing more. It is 100% source, and it is 100% free.
If you are going to go around making pronouncements from your pulpit,
you might want to go educate yourself.
But once again, you failed to educate yourself before you opened your
big fat mouth on a talk show and stated utterly uneducated and false
statements . You have had ample opportunity to say "I was wrong", yet
you have not done so yet.
You keep argueing, and that is because you are a coward.
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| pageexec | Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
git: | |
