> Not calling someone unfriendly and just focusing on the
There is nothing to discuss with me.
Richard claimed that there is non-free software in OpenBSD. That is
not true.
It is no more true than Linux being able to run commercial binaries.
The ports tree is just a scaffold.
Richard, you are wrong. You said very clearly in your interview that
the ports tree contains non-free software. It does not. It is just a
scaffold of Makefiles containing URLs, and an occasional patch here or
there.
You are just plain wrong. And you are not enough of a man to admit
that you are wrong.
I may be unfriendly at times, but you are a power-misusing
hypocritical liar who attacks projects that try harder than any
others to only make free software available.
Shame on you.
| Lennart Sorensen | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Dmitry Torokhov | Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm3 |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
