> Not calling someone unfriendly and just focusing on the
There is nothing to discuss with me.
Richard claimed that there is non-free software in OpenBSD. That is
not true.
It is no more true than Linux being able to run commercial binaries.
The ports tree is just a scaffold.
Richard, you are wrong. You said very clearly in your interview that
the ports tree contains non-free software. It does not. It is just a
scaffold of Makefiles containing URLs, and an occasional patch here or
there.
You are just plain wrong. And you are not enough of a man to admit
that you are wrong.
I may be unfriendly at times, but you are a power-misusing
hypocritical liar who attacks projects that try harder than any
others to only make free software available.
Shame on you.
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Mark Lord | 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Marcin Slusarz | Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1: build failure (x86) |
| Balbir Singh | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] RSS controller core |
git: | |
| bcpa | Binkley/Rfmaill/Cnews scripts?.. |
| Rogier Wolff | Re: MIPS R3000 board to run Linux, anyone? |
| Gary Kahn | compiled ghostscript, got 2 megabyte executable |
| Joshua Lobel | Does anyone know anything about LOCUS' DOS MERGE running on Linux |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
