On Dec 11, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Including a program by name in the ports system does suggest using
Where is your line in the sand? When does an operating system become
free by your interpretation? When non-free ports frameworks are
hosted outside the official OpenBSD cvs repository? On a server not
owned by the OpenBSD project? What if I want to host it on my own
server, but I also happen to be an OpenBSD developer? When does the
disassociation satisfy your unpublished requirements?
Your interpretation is vague and self-serving.
---
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
| Ingo Molnar | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
