On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
Strictly speaking, no. If you unpack ports.tar.gz
you will find a bunch of makefiles, packing lists,
& c., all of which are free. OpenBSD's ports system
depends on programs in the base system which are free.
On a modern UNIX-like operating system it possible,
even easy, to use free tools like awk, make, perl,
sh, and so on, directly or indirectly, to facilitate
the installation and maintenance of (free and non-free)
software. Your asking the question indicates that you
might have done better to exclude OpenBSD from the
scope of your remarks. When one does not know, the
most appropriate statement is 'I don't know.'
Loosely speaking, you can get away with saying
pretty much anything that suits you at the time.
Loosely speaking is the problem.
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Michael Kerrisk | nanosleep() uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC, should be CLOCK_REALTIME? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Gary Thomas | Marvell 88E609x switch? |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
