Richard Stallman wrote:

quoted text
>...

> On the other hand, if a distro's policies say something is allowed,

> then it isn't a mistake, and I can't expect it to be fixed.  That's

> what gives me stronger concern.  The presence of non-free programs

> in the OpenBSD ports system is not a mistake, it's intentional.

Partitioning the non-free material from the free material in the ports

would be a first step.  There are many who might choose to put their

efforts into a free tool (or start one if it is missing) if the

licensing categories were more apparent.
-Lars