On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:43 AM, Lars Noodin wrote:

quoted text
> Marc Espie wrote:
>> ...
>> You've got a choice of:
>
> Or
>
> 4) not up on the OpenBSD projects goals and current licensing
> requirements
>
>
> Some of that is probably due to the low profile of OpenBSD (low-
> profile
> is good, though) and the yammering of the FreeBSD crowd (which both
> includes a lot of MSFTers, and takes it upon itself to represent
> all *BSD).
>
> I realize it's good fun in Redmond to poke at RMS, however, that will
> not inform the public about the advantages of OpenBSD.  The only
> purpose
> there is to make everyone look bad.
>
> Articles and other means of providing information about OpenBSD will
> increase knowledge of OpenBSD.

So a high profile public figure talking out of his ass and
representing things he's not informed about as facts as opposed to
asking questions to get informed is better ... how? That's what we
would expect from a political activist not an engineer.