On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:20:00 -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> That being said, the OpenBSD developers have given their arguments why

quoted text
> they include firmware and non-free ports, and RMS has given his

> arguments why he doesn't recommend systems that do.  I don't see this

> thread leading to reconciliation of the two sides.

Thanks, Matthew, for some balances in this thread.

I don't see a need to reconcile the two sides. (It would be good if that

was possible, though.)
RMS wrote, why in his personal opinion, he does not recommend the use of

OpenBSD. And some p*** at him. What a shame ! 'Freedom' is not only

one's choice of software, but also one's choice of an own opinion.

It would serve this list and the people on it well, to allow RMS to voice

his own opinion. And, if in personal disagreement, argue. Like some

actually did in here.