..maybe you should look into the OpenBSD project, methods, and the endRMS,
Given what I've read, listened to, and specifically what you've said here:
> From what I have heard, OpenBSD does not contain non-free software
> I could recommend OpenBSD privately with a clear conscience to someone
the ultimate freedom is that of free choice. As I've seen, the OpenBSD
developers have fought tooth-and-nail, in many cases to the bitter
end, to provide the cleanest and freest operating system available. It
is coherent, and cohesive. In some cases, it's frustrating, simply
because support for non-free entities are sketchy or flat-out aren't
available. But at the same time, the opportunity remains open for
folks to implement their non-free whatevers if they so choose, though
they probably won't get the support of the developers, they may get
support from other users.. all of us are working with varying levels
of conviction and outside influences. That being said, I believe those
of the developers, many openbsd users, are stricter and more focused
any other single group of computer users.
again.. my words come from my perspective, from what I've heard/read
on this list and across the internet, as well as my experiences in
using windows, linux, *BSD, and seeing the effects of these sorts of
issues even in the non-technical areas of our lives.
So again.. I think OpenBSD should be tried and explored before being labeled.
Thank you for your time,
~Jason
| Mike Galbraith | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [3/22] x86_64: Kill temp boot pmds |
| Alan Cox | Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...? |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 05/37] dccp: Cleanup routines for feature negotiation |
| Brandeburg, Jesse | RE: [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts |
