Richard Stallman wrote:
quoted text
> Since I consider non-free software to be unethical and antisocial, I
> think it would be wrong for me to recommend it to others.  Therefore,
> if a collection of software contains (or suggests installation of)
> some non-free program, I do not recommend it.  The systems I recommend
> are therefore those that do not contain (or suggest installation of)
> non-free software.

Is the list at:
http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html#FreeGNULinuxDistributions
the list of operating systems that meet your criteria?  It appears that 
gNewSense includes LAME in binary format, and BLAG "recommends" it at 
https://wiki.blagblagblag.org/Lame in much the same way OpenBSD does.
In fact, BLAG suggests other unfree programs, such as unrar 
(https://wiki.blagblagblag.org/Unrar), even noting that the software is 
non-free.

Since I have time to rant but don't have time and resources to download 
and install two new operating systems, feel free to correct me if my 
impressions are wrong.

quoted text
> I therefore exercise my freedom of speech by not including
> OpenBSD in the list of systems that I recommend to the public.

I don't think anyone is particularly upset that OpenBSD isn't among the 
software you recommend, but to claim that OpenBSD includes "non-free" 
software in its ports collection (using your definition of "free") while 
claiming that gNewSense meets your criteria is disingenuous at best.