Richard Stallman wrote:

quoted text
> Since I consider non-free software to be unethical and antisocial, I

> think it would be wrong for me to recommend it to others.  Therefore,

> if a collection of software contains (or suggests installation of)

> some non-free program, I do not recommend it.  The systems I recommend

> are therefore those that do not contain (or suggest installation of)

> non-free software.

Is the list at:

http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html#FreeGNULinuxDistributions

the list of operating systems that meet your criteria?  It appears that

gNewSense includes LAME in binary format, and BLAG "recommends" it at

https://wiki.blagblagblag.org/Lame in much the same way OpenBSD does.

In fact, BLAG suggests other unfree programs, such as unrar

(https://wiki.blagblagblag.org/Unrar), even noting that the software is

non-free.
Since I have time to rant but don't have time and resources to download

and install two new operating systems, feel free to correct me if my

impressions are wrong.
> I therefore exercise my freedom of speech by not including

quoted text
> OpenBSD in the list of systems that I recommend to the public.

I don't think anyone is particularly upset that OpenBSD isn't among the

software you recommend, but to claim that OpenBSD includes "non-free"

software in its ports collection (using your definition of "free") while

claiming that gNewSense meets your criteria is disingenuous at best.