On 12/10/07, Richard Stallman  wrote:

quoted text
> One question particularly relevant for this list is why I don't

> recommend OpenBSD.  It is not about what the system allows.  (Any

> general purpose system allows doing anything at all.)  It is about

> what the system suggests to the user.

>

> Since I consider non-free software to be unethical and antisocial, I

> think it would be wrong for me to recommend it to others.  Therefore,

> if a collection of software contains (or suggests installation of)

> some non-free program, I do not recommend it.  The systems I recommend

> are therefore those that do not contain (or suggest installation of)

> non-free software.

>

> From what I have heard, OpenBSD does not contain non-free software

> (though I am not sure whether it contains any non-free firmware

> blobs).

Um, OpenBSD is the only common OS that is actively against blobs. See

http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#39

We're on the same side here.
> The fact that OpenBSD is not a variant of GNU is not ethically

quoted text
> important.  If OpenBSD did not suggest non-free programs, I would

> recommend it along with the free GNU/Linux distros.

Sir, it was brought up that the linux distributions you do suggest do

often include in their ports systems non-free software. See e.g.

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119726055819074&w=2

What do you say to that? Was that a lie or a mistake?
Respectfully,

-Nick