On 12/10/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms@1407.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:57:53PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
> > Yes this is quite silly.  Stallman insists on "free" software, and
> > distributions are only acceptable if they shove that software down
> > the users throats in the stead of something else, thus restricting
> > the users freedom.
>
> illegal logical conclusion: core dumped
>
> Users can always install whatever they can, if it is compatible at all,
> but a most extremely honourable distribution of software won't teach
> users that non-free is ok by giving an example: not distributing it.

Since when was propaganda honourable?

quoted text
> > always going to be someone respected taking shots at you.  Talking
> > about it gets noting accomplished.
>
> Neither does bullshitting about it.

Exactly.

-Nick