* Kevin Stam <harpalus.como@gmail.com> [2007-12-09 23:41:28]:Yes this is quite silly. Stallman insists on "free" software, and distributions are only acceptable if they shove that software down the users throats in the stead of something else, thus restricting the users freedom. Besides, nobody is forcing you to install any of the ports. Forced freedom, that's just a blatent contradiction. Have I summised it well? Can we let this one go now? There's always going to be someone respected taking shots at you. Talking about it gets noting accomplished. -- Travers Buda
| Ryan Hope | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Robin Lee Powell | NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested. |
| Rene Herman | Re: New conflict message in latest GIT |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 013/196] Documentation: Replace obsolete "driverfs" with "sysfs". |
git: | |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH] Teach remote machinery about remotes.default config variable |
| Jakub Narebski | [PATCH] gitweb: Use File::Find::find in git_get_projects_list |
| Shawn O. Pearce | [PATCH] Correct dir.c to compile on Solaris 9 |
| Christian Couder | [PATCH] help: warn if specified 'man.viewer' is unsupported, instead of erroring out |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Steven Surdock | Problems with second ipsec(ctl) tunnel |
| Chris | Prolific USB-Serial Controller |
| Wijnand Wiersma | Almost success: OpenBSD on Xen |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Stephen Pierce | SLS |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Peter MacDonald | shoelace |
